OxINT Strategic Research

Sovcomflot Under Sanctions: Russia's State Tanker Fleet

An entity and corporate-structure brief on PAO Sovcomflot (SCF Group) — its state ownership, the OFAC, EU and UK designations stacked against it, and how analysts trace its vessels and subsidiaries through public registries.

CASE: SCF-NET-2026DATE: 2026-05-31VECTORS: OSINT · CORP-INT · GEOINT

Few corporate names recur as often in Russia sanctions enforcement as Sovcomflot — formally PAO Sovcomflot (Joint Stock Company Sovcomflot / SCF Group). It is the Russian state's flagship maritime company and the operator most closely associated with moving Russian crude and refined products to global markets. Because Sovcomflot is state-owned, openly listed in public registries, and individually designated by several jurisdictions, it is one of the cleanest case studies available for entity-level sanctions research. This brief synthesizes the public record on the SCF corporate structure, its layered designations, the post-2022 vessel transfers that drew regulator attention, and the open-source workflow analysts use to map the group.

SCOPE   This is an OSINT synthesis of publicly reported facts and primary designation records. Every designation below is sourced to an official body or major outlet in the Sources register. Where a specific subsidiary or vessel could not be independently verified, it is described in general terms rather than named.

1. The Entity: What PAO Sovcomflot Is

Corporate identity and state ownership

Sovcomflot is the largest shipping company in Russia and historically one of the larger tanker operators worldwide, specializing in crude oil, petroleum products, and liquefied gas transportation, alongside offshore and ice-class services. The company traces to the Soviet-era "Sovcomflot" (a contraction of Sovetskiy Kommercheskiy Flot, "Soviet Commercial Fleet") and is headquartered in Russia, registered in St. Petersburg; offices in Moscow.

The defining feature for sanctions purposes is ownership. Sovcomflot conducted a partial initial public offering on the Moscow Exchange in October 2020, but the Russian Federation retained the controlling majority of shares — reported at roughly 82.8% state ownership after the IPO. REPORTED That majority state control is precisely what places Sovcomflot inside the scope of authorities targeting Russian government-owned enterprises.

Table 1 — PAO Sovcomflot entity profile (public record)
AttributeValueNote
Legal formPAO (public joint-stock company)"SCF Group" used internationally
SectorMarine transportationCrude, products, LNG, offshore
State ownership~82.8% Russian FederationAfter Oct 2020 partial IPO
ListingMoscow Exchange (FLOT)IPO October 2020
HeadquartersSaint Petersburg, RussiaOperational/management offices historically abroad
Registration (OGRN)1027739028712Russian legal-entity register
Tax ID (INN)7702060116Russian Federal Tax Service
RoleLargest Russian shipping companyStrategic state asset

These two identifiers — the OGRN (primary state registration number, 1027739028712) and INN (taxpayer number, 7702060116) — are the anchors analysts use to pin the entity in registries and to disambiguate it from the dozens of name-similar SCF-prefixed companies. CONFIRMED

For the broader picture of how state-linked tankers shifted into opaque ownership after 2022, see our shadow fleet intelligence brief, which maps the wider population of vessels carrying Russian crude outside Western insurance and oversight.

2. The Sanctions Stack Against Sovcomflot

Sovcomflot is not subject to a single action but to a layered set of measures that escalated from capital-market restrictions to a full asset block. Understanding the sequence matters: the legal effect of a Directive-3 capital restriction is very different from a Specially Designated National (SDN) blocking designation, even when the same name appears in both.

United States (OFAC)

The US imposed two distinct rounds. First, on 24 February 2022, the US Treasury named Sovcomflot among the major Russian state-owned enterprises subjected to debt and equity restrictions under Directive 3 of Executive Order 14024, cutting the company off from US capital and financing. CONFIRMED

The decisive step came on 23 February 2024, when OFAC designated Joint Stock Company Sovcomflot as a blocked party (added to the SDN list) under Executive Order 14024, and identified 14 crude oil tankers as property in which the company has an interest. CRITICAL Treasury framed the action around Sovcomflot's role carrying Russian oil and its links to price-cap evasion, and concurrently issued wind-down general licenses (including authorization to offload cargo from the 14 named vessels for a limited period). Notably, OFAC's general licenses made clear that traders could continue dealing with the rest of Sovcomflot's fleet, leaving most SCF tonnage outside the blocking action.

Named vessels in the 23 February 2024 action included tankers such as NS Captain, NS Antarctic (IMO 9413559), NS Bravo (IMO 9412359), NS Burgas (IMO 9411020), Liteyny Prospect, and Nevskiy Prospect, among others. REPORTED

European Union

The EU first imposed restrictions on Sovcomflot on 15 March 2022 following the invasion of Ukraine, listing it among Russian state-owned companies with which transactions were prohibited after a wind-down period. CONFIRMED The EU's broader measures against Russian crude transport then expanded through its oil import ban, the G7-aligned price cap (in force from December 2022), and port-access and service restrictions. In its 14th sanctions package (June 2024), the EU for the first time listed specific ships, designating an initial tranche of 27 vessels under a port-access ban and a ban on services including insurance, chartering, management, brokering and ship-to-ship transfers — a list that has since grown into the hundreds. HIGH

United Kingdom (OFSI)

The United Kingdom added Sovcomflot to its Russia sanctions regime, administered by the Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI), on 24 March 2022, imposing an asset freeze that bars UK persons from financial dealings with the company. CONFIRMED Because much of the world's marine insurance and reinsurance market is based in London, the listing materially constrained SCF's access to cover. The UK has subsequently added large tranches of shadow-fleet tankers — including former Sovcomflot vessels reflagged elsewhere — to its sanctions list.

Table 2 — Designation timeline (authority and date)
DateAuthorityActionInstrument
24 Feb 2022US / OFACDebt & equity restrictions (eff. 26 Mar 2022)Directive 3, EO 14024
15 Mar 2022EUTransaction prohibition (state-owned entity)Russia regime listing
24 Mar 2022UK / OFSIAsset freezeRussia (Sanctions) (EU Exit) Regs
23 Feb 2024US / OFACFull SDN block + 14 vessels identifiedEO 14024
Jun 2024EUFirst vessel-specific listings (14th package)Annex / port + service ban
Table 3 — Restriction types compared
MeasureLegal effectTrades it stops
Directive 3 (capital)No new US debt/equity dealingsFinancing, securities
SDN blockAll US-nexus property frozenMost commercial dealings with US persons
Vessel identificationNamed ships flagged as blocked propertyPort calls, services, charters
Price cap / oil banService ban above cap; import banInsured Western-serviced cargoes

3. Why Vessel-Level Designation Changes the Game

When a regulator moves from designating a company to identifying specific vessels as blocked property, the practical enforcement surface expands dramatically. A named, IMO-numbered tanker cannot change its identity the way an obscure shell company can. Port authorities, classification societies, insurers, and bunker suppliers can screen against the hull number directly.

OFAC's February 2024 action illustrated this by pairing the SCF parent designation with a concrete list of vessels. That dual approach — entity plus assets — is the template now widely applied across Russia maritime enforcement, because it closes the gap between a sanctioned owner and the physically operating ships.

Table 4 — Entity-only vs. vessel-level designation
DimensionEntity-only+ Vessel identification
Screening anchorCompany name / aliasesIMO number (immutable)
Evasion via renamingEasierMuch harder
Port-state enforceabilityIndirectDirect hull-level check
Insurer exposureCounterparty-dependentPer-voyage clear

COMPLIANCE   A vessel previously operated by a designated owner may be re-registered, renamed, or shifted to a new manager. Hull-level (IMO) screening, not name screening, is the only reliable defense. Our sanctions compliance service builds screening around immutable identifiers rather than mutable names.

4. Post-2022 Transfers, Reflagging, and Ownership Opacity

A recurring theme in reporting on Russian state tonnage after February 2022 is the migration of vessels away from transparent Western-linked ownership, management, flag, and insurance toward more opaque arrangements. In Sovcomflot's case this is concretely documented: management of much of the fleet shifted from a Cyprus base to Dubai, with reporting tying SCF tonnage to a UAE management entity operating under an SCF-derived name, and a related Dubai-based manager, Sun Ship Management, has been associated with controlling a large portion of the fleet. HIGH Western insurers withdrew — P&I cover from a London-market club was reported as cancelled in 2022 — and the fleet moved to Russian insurers and alternative safety-certification arrangements.

Reflagging followed. Reporting documents former Sovcomflot vessels being re-registered under flags such as Gabon while still bearing the tell-tale "SCF" name prefix or their former Russian names, and a subsequent wave of vessels reflagging back to Russia. HIGH These maneuvers are precisely why regulators paired entity designations with vessel identification: an owning or managing company can be substituted on paper, but the ship and its IMO number persist. Analysts treat sudden, clustered changes in flag, registered owner, manager, and insurer as a behavioral signal worth investigating, rather than assuming any single change proves evasion.

Table 5 — Reflagging / transfer signals analysts track (methodology)
SignalWhat it may indicateOSINT source
Flag change to open registryDistancing from prior jurisdictionEQUASIS, registry data
New registered owner SPVLayering of ownershipOpenCorporates, EQUASIS
Manager changeBreak in commercial chainEQUASIS
P&I club exitLoss of Western insuranceClub lists, EQUASIS
AIS gaps near load portsConcealment of cargo originAIS / GEOINT

AIS silence is one of the strongest behavioral tells for sanctioned tonnage. Our AIS gap analysis methodology explains how analysts distinguish ordinary signal loss from deliberate dark-activity around designated vessels.

5. Researching Sovcomflot Through Public Registries

The strength of the Sovcomflot case for analysts is that nearly every layer is publicly documentable. Below is the open-source workflow we apply to any state-linked maritime group, using SCF as the worked example.

Step 1 — Confirm the designation record

Begin with the primary sanctions sources. Search the OFAC SDN list for the entity and any identified vessels, and cross-check aggregated coverage on OpenSanctions, which consolidates US, EU, UK and other listings into a single searchable record with aliases and identifiers. This establishes who is designated, by whom, and when.

For PAO Sovcomflot, OpenSanctions consolidates listings from OFAC, the EU Council, UK FCDO, Swiss SECO, Canada, Australia and others under one record, and surfaces related entries — the parent, foreign subsidiaries historically registered in jurisdictions such as Cyprus and the UK, named vessels, and affiliated individuals. CONFIRMED

Step 2 — Map the corporate shell

Use OpenCorporates to locate registered entities bearing the Sovcomflot / SCF name and to identify related companies, addresses, and officers, keying on the OGRN (1027739028712) and INN (7702060116) to confirm you have the right entity. State groups frequently hold tonnage through intermediate owning and management companies — for example, UAE-registered managers operating ex-SCF tonnage — so the registry trail is where layering becomes visible. Combine with a UBO (ultimate beneficial owner) assessment to connect operating companies back to the state shareholder.

Step 3 — Tie companies to hulls

Use EQUASIS — the free public maritime database — to connect a company to specific IMO-numbered vessels, and to track historical changes in registered owner, manager, flag, and classification society. This is the bridge between a corporate record and a physical ship.

Table 6 — Public registry toolkit for entity research
SourceBest forCost
OFAC SDN listAuthoritative US designationsFree
OpenSanctionsCross-jurisdiction consolidationFree / API
OpenCorporatesCompany registry & officersFree / API
EQUASISVessel-to-company linkageFree (registration)
EU Official JournalEU legal instrumentsFree
UK OFSI listUK financial sanctionsFree
Table 7 — Pivot logic when an SCF entity name appears
You findPivot toGoal
Company name in registryEQUASIS owner searchFind linked vessels
Vessel IMOOFAC / OpenSanctionsCheck blocked status
Officer / addressOpenCorporates networkMap related shells
Flag changeRegistry historyDate the transfer

Connecting an operating company to the state shareholder is the crux of any state-enterprise case. Our UBO verification solution formalizes that chain, and the sanctions check tool lets analysts screen a name or IMO number against consolidated lists in seconds.

6. Analytical Cautions

Entity research on state groups carries specific failure modes. Names are reused and transliterated inconsistently (Sovcomflot vs. SCF vs. Cyrillic forms), so name-only screening produces both false positives and dangerous misses. Designations also have effective dates and wind-down windows, meaning a transaction's legality depends on its timing relative to the listing. And the absence of a specific subsidiary from a public list is not proof it is unconnected — it may simply not yet be designated.

Table 8 — Common entity-research pitfalls
PitfallMitigation
Name-only matchingScreen on IMO + registration numbers
Ignoring effective datesPin every claim to a designation date
Assuming "not listed = clean"Apply 50%-ownership / control tests
Transliteration driftUse OpenSanctions alias sets
Stale registry dataCheck EQUASIS history, not just current
Table 9 — Confidence tiers used in this brief
TierMeaning
CONFIRMEDStated in a primary or major-outlet source
HIGHWell-supported, regime-level documented
CRITICALHigh-impact finding for compliance action

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Sovcomflot actually sanctioned?

Yes. Sovcomflot has been subject to US measures since 24 February 2022 (Directive 3 capital restrictions under EO 14024) and was added to the OFAC SDN list as a fully blocked party on 23 February 2024 under EO 14024, alongside 14 named oil tankers. The EU listed it on 15 March 2022 and the UK on 24 March 2022; it is also sanctioned by Australia, Canada and others.

When did OFAC fully block Sovcomflot?

On 23 February 2024, OFAC designated PAO Sovcomflot as a blocked party and identified a set of vessels — reported as 14 tankers — as property in which the company has an interest, under Executive Order 14024.

Who owns Sovcomflot?

The Russian Federation is the controlling shareholder. After a partial IPO on the Moscow Exchange in October 2020, the state retained a reported ~82.8% majority stake, making Sovcomflot a state-owned strategic enterprise.

How can I research Sovcomflot on OpenCorporates and OpenSanctions?

Search OpenSanctions for the consolidated designation record (US, EU, UK aliases and identifiers), then use OpenCorporates to map registered entities, addresses, and officers bearing the Sovcomflot / SCF name. Bridge from company to ships using EQUASIS by IMO number.

What is the difference between Directive 3 restrictions and an SDN block?

Directive 3 prohibits new US dealings in an entity's debt and equity but does not freeze all property. An SDN block freezes all property and interests in property with a US nexus and broadly prohibits dealings by US persons — a far more comprehensive measure.

Why does vessel-level designation matter more than naming the company?

A company can be substituted on paper, but a ship's IMO number is permanent. Identifying named, IMO-numbered vessels lets ports, insurers, and suppliers screen the physical asset directly, closing the gap exploited by renaming and reflagging.

Sources

  1. U.S. Department of the Treasury — "U.S. Treasury Designates Russian State-Owned Sovcomflot, Russia's Largest Shipping Company" (23 February 2024): https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy2121
  2. OFAC — Russia-related Designations; Issuance of Russia-related General Licenses (recent action, 23 February 2024): https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20240223_33
  3. OFAC — FAQ 984 on Directive 3 under EO 14024 (new debt and equity restrictions): https://ofac.treasury.gov/faqs/984
  4. OpenSanctions — consolidated sanctions record for Sovcomflot / PAO Sovcomflot / SCF: https://www.opensanctions.org/search/?q=Sovcomflot
  5. Wikipedia — Sovcomflot (corporate structure, state ownership, IPO, sanctions overview): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovcomflot
  6. Council of the EU — sanctions against Russia (oil import ban, price cap, shipping measures): https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/sanctions-against-russia/
  7. UK OFSI — consolidated list of financial sanctions targets (Russia regime): https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/financial-sanctions-consolidated-list-of-targets
  8. EQUASIS — public maritime database for vessel ownership, management, flag and class history: https://www.equasis.org/
  9. OpenCorporates — open database of companies for registry and officer mapping: https://opencorporates.com/