[ Sample Deliverables ]

What an [0x]INT Report Looks Like

Anonymized excerpts from real engagements. Every report follows a structured format — source-cited, risk-rated, and designed for compliance committees, legal counsel, and board-level review.

[ Report Types ]

Four deliverable formats

Each engagement type produces a different report. Here's what you receive — structure, depth, and page count depend on scope.

Due Diligence 40–80 pp.

Corporate Due Diligence Report

Full ownership graph, financial analysis, litigation history, sanctions exposure, digital footprint. Structured for compliance committees.

Contents
  • Executive Summary3
  • Entity Profile & Registration5
  • Ownership Structure & UBO Chain9
  • Financial Health Analysis18
  • Litigation & Enforcement History28
  • Sanctions & Adverse Media Screening36
  • Digital Exposure Assessment42
  • Risk Classification & Recommendations48
  • Appendix: Source Documents52
Sanctions 15–30 pp.

Sanctions Exposure Memo

UBO identification, multi-list screening, SDN proximity mapping, risk classification. Designed for sanctions officers and audit trails.

Contents
  • Executive Summary & Risk Rating2
  • Entity Identification4
  • Ownership Chain Resolution6
  • Multi-List Screening Results10
  • SDN Proximity Analysis14
  • Evasion Pattern Assessment18
  • Risk Classification & Action Items22
  • Appendix: List Citations25
UBO 20–50 pp.

UBO Resolution Report

Full nominee chain resolution, visual ownership graph, family/proxy network mapping, sanctions proximity of identified UBOs.

Contents
  • Executive Summary2
  • Target Entity Profile4
  • Ownership Chain (Layer-by-Layer)7
  • Nominee Identification & Evidence15
  • UBO Assessment (Confidence-Rated)22
  • Family & Proxy Network28
  • Ownership Graph Visualization34
  • Appendix: EGRUL Extracts38
Digital 15–30 pp.

Digital Exposure Report

Breached credentials, dark web presence, Telegram intelligence, infrastructure vulnerabilities, executive digital footprint. Risk-scored.

Contents
  • Executive Summary & Risk Score2
  • Credential Exposure Analysis4
  • Dark Web & Forum Mentions8
  • Telegram / Social Intelligence12
  • Infrastructure Assessment16
  • Executive Digital Footprint20
  • Findings & Remediation24
[ Anonymized Excerpt ]

Inside a due diligence report

The following is a redacted excerpt from an actual [0x]INT corporate due diligence engagement on a Russian vendor.

[0x]INT — Corporate Due Diligence Report
RISK: HIGH
1. Executive Summary

Subject: ООО «[REDACTED]» (INN [REDACTED]), registered in Moscow, RF.
Engagement type: Pre-contract vendor due diligence for [Client — European industrial group].

The target entity presents elevated risk due to a multi-layered ownership structure involving nominee directors, a Cyprus-registered holding, and a UBO identified as 2 ownership hops from an OFAC SDN-listed individual. Financial analysis reveals a 72% revenue decline over the past 3 fiscal years with concurrent director compensation increases, consistent with asset extraction patterns. The entity has 14 active litigation cases in Moscow arbitrazh courts, including two filed by the Federal Tax Service.

3. Ownership Structure

Resolved ownership chain (5 layers):

ООО «[TARGET]» → [Nominee Director] (100%) → [Cyprus Holding Ltd] → [BVI Vehicle] → [UBO — SDN proximity: 2 hops]

Source: EGRUL extract #[REF], dated 2026-02-18 · SPARK-Interfax corporate graph · Cyprus Companies House filing #[REF]

8. Key Findings
Critical UBO is 2 ownership hops from OFAC SDN-listed individual [NAME], designated under E.O. 14024 (April 2022). Ownership chain designed to obscure this connection.
High Revenue declined 72% over FY2023–2025 while director compensation increased 340%. Pattern consistent with asset extraction ahead of anticipated enforcement action.
High 14 active litigation cases in Moscow Arbitration Court, including 2 FTS claims for tax underpayment totaling ₽[AMOUNT].
Medium CFO email (corporate domain) found in 3 breach databases including [BREACH NAME] (2024). Password reuse pattern detected across 2 services.
Low Company website SSL certificate expired 47 days ago. Mail server missing SPF and DMARC records. Minor indicators of poor digital hygiene.
[ Anonymized Excerpt ]

Inside a sanctions exposure memo

SDN proximity analysis and multi-list screening results from a pre-transaction sanctions assessment.

[0x]INT — Sanctions Exposure Memo
RISK: ELEVATED
4. Multi-List Screening Results
List Entity Match Director Match UBO Match
OFAC SDN——PROXIMITY (2 hops)
OFAC SSI———
EU Consolidated—POTENTIAL MATCH—
UN Security Council———
UK OFSI———
Swiss SECO———
5. SDN Proximity Analysis

The identified UBO ([NAME]) is not directly designated on any sanctions list. However, ownership chain analysis reveals a 2-hop connection to OFAC SDN-listed [NAME] through a shared beneficial interest in [Entity, BVI]. Under the OFAC 50% Rule, entities owned ≥50% by a blocked person are themselves blocked — the current shared ownership stake is 47%, placing this connection below the automatic blocking threshold but within elevated risk territory.

Assessment: The entity does not meet the technical threshold for blocking under the OFAC 50% Rule, but the proximity creates significant reputational and regulatory risk. Enhanced ongoing monitoring is recommended.

[ Delivery ]

How reports are delivered

📄
PDF Report

Structured, branded, board-ready. Available in English, German, or French. Source citations in appendix.

📊
Ownership Graph

Visual corporate structure with percentage stakes, snapshot dates, and sanctioned entity flags. Embedded in report.

🗂️
Data Export

Structured CSV/JSON export of entity data, ownership chains, and screening results for integration into your GRC platform.

[ Request a Sample ]

Want to see a full anonymized report before engaging? Contact us and specify the report type.

Request Intelligence Read Our Methodology

Full anonymized samples available upon request · Secure channels